Showing posts with label Sarah Palin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarah Palin. Show all posts

Sunday, March 11, 2012

MOVIE REVIEW: Game Change (2012)



Hi everyone! Sorry for having been away for so long. Law school has consumed a better part of my life, and I'm finally on Spring Break for the next week or so. I plan on doing a re-cap of how my first year went, as soon as the time is right, because I feel like some bright-eyed, future student out there could use the advice. But more on that, later...

On my second night home, I watched Game Change, the HBO movie, based on the book about the 2008 US Presidential Election. Focused on the Republican Party's  John McCain campaign, the audience gets an inside, albeit dramatized look at the pressured campaign managers as they try to combat bad PR and tackle two "maverick" candidates.

Most of us lived through this little piece of history, but few are aware and perhaps uninterested as to what actually happened behind-the-scenes. Faced with deciding on a running mate for the presidential ticket, John McCain selects the hockey-mom Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, igniting a media firestorm from Palin's formidible celebrity presence to that of Democratic candidate Barack Obama. With her strong moral values, down-to-earth disposition, and close family ties, Palin becomes an overnight poster-child for the conservative movement. The rest of political America, however, is less than pleased, when it soon becomes apparent that her political acumen, and personal life are not up to snuff. We know how this ends, but what we didn't know, then, for Palin, it was just beginning.

While not my favorite story in the canon of political campaigns, there's a lot to like about Game Change. Even if you look at everyone who was involved in the production and understand most of them have strong liberal backgrounds, it's a better experience if that notion is dropped in favor of the enjoyment of good storytelling, which is exactly what the film features. This is a story best described as good intentions that didn't quite pan out as expected; a tragedy of errors. Not just because McCain's campain managers didn't realize the proverbial pandora's box they unleashed with Palin, but because her strong personality (or ego, if you will) was more than anything the McCain campaign was ready to deal with.

Amongst the star-studded cast, Julianne Moore's portrayal of Sarah Palin arguably outshines the rest. She really transforms into the role, but her portrayal is a much more subtle, realistic rendition of Palin then the Emmy-winning masterpiece Tina Fey offered in '08 (she makes two cameo appearances in SNL archive footage). Moore offers the audience to look into the mind of a fiercely independent woman, who refused to sacrifice her beliefs for the political game. Perhaps Palin is more misunderstood than we thought. In the end, one starts to think she was meant for something less obstrusive and more rewarding than politics, after we see the effects it has on her family and personal life.

Game Change, at times, is painfully like what I observed one reviewer say: "watching the A student trying to help the D student pass the final exam."  It is clear from the narrative that the McCain campaign managers feel the campaign is doomed once Palin enters the picture. I presume most of what I'm watching is taken from reliable sources within the campaign, although I did feel at times that Palin's "nervous breakdowns" and moments of morose catatonia reeked of melodrama, especially when the advisors begin to question her mental health. It certainly works in the field of drama, but something about it didn't sit right with me. Lastly, with the majority of the perspecitve fixated on Palin (who is, arguably, the more fascinating figure in this yarn), it would have been nice to see more of McCain's perspective too.

Despite my mild criticisms, Game Change is absolutely worth your time, even if for just the performances alone.

8/10

Peace,
- Jon

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Tuscon Arizona Shooting

Earlier this morning, it was reported that a 22 year-old gunman by the name of Jared Loughner opened fire on a shopping center in Tuscon, Arizona. Among his eighteen victims; six of which were killed, included Federal Judge John McCarthy Roll and Democratic State Representative Gabrielle Giffords. Roll was killed, while Giffords survived an "in-out" gunshot wound to the head. At the time of this writing, she's been sent to the ICU.


One of the more interesting things I've been hearing across the web is Sarah Palin's "involvement" in this unspeakable tragedy. Apparently, her PAC had made the following campaign ad, prior to the 2010 midterm elections. The ad placed a target over Tuscon, representing Palin's wishes for Republicans to defeat the incumbent Giffords because of her support and ultimately pledged protection for President Obama's healthcare reform. More can be read about "Sarah PAC"'s campaign goals here.


Now, don't get me wrong, I dislike Sarah Palin as much as the next person with an ample amount of brain cells. Her credibility as a politician and a helmswoman for the Republican party are, in my opinion, embarrassing for conservative Americans (and Americans in general). She's a hyper-charismatic cheerleader for the GOP with too much money and too little social cognizance or cultural sensitivity. This kind of political campaigning; putting targets on a map, is an example of her lack of insight towards considering the type of implications that ads like these can make.

However, in her defense, I think a lot of what these bloggers are insinuating by saying malarky such as "Palin ordered a hit on Giffords!" or "Palin provoked the gunman with her campaign!" is a tad far-fetched. I think the global lesson here is where one person makes a mistake, the other side makes themselves no better by turning a horrible tragedy into an excuse to sling mud at the other side of Giffords' political party. How come none of these crazy bloggers are calling this a hate crime, either? Didn't anyone fail to point out that Giffords is Jewish? No one is going to win by pointing fingers at each other, but hopefully this event will serve as a call to review the kind of language and themes politicians use when they make these campaigns.

I don't think we're going to know for a while what Jared Loughner's exact motives were to attack that Tuscon shopping center, whether they were politically motivated, or if he's just crazy. What I did find was this interesting video from his (now deactivated) MySpace page:


Misunderstood visionary? Or misguided, unrestrained radical? I know typically not to judge a book by it's cover, but senslessly killing six people inclines me to lean towards the latter.

My thoughts and prayers to the families of the victims,
- Jon